Gulnoza Adilmetova, Ruslan Nassyrov, Aizhan Meyerbekova, Aknur Karabay, Huseyin Atakan Varol, Mei-Yen Chan,
Evaluating ChatGPT’s Multilingual Performance in Clinical Nutrition Advice Using Synthetic Medical Text: Insights from Central Asia,
The Journal of Nutrition,
Volume 155, Issue 3,
2025,
Pages 729-735,
ISSN 0022-3166,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tjnut.2024.12.018.
(https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022316624012458)
Abstract: Background
Although large language models like ChatGPT-4 have demonstrated competency in English, their performance for minority groups speaking underrepresented languages, as well as their ability to adapt to specific sociocultural nuances and regional cuisines, such as those in Central Asia (for example, Kazakhstan), still requires further investigation.
Objectives
To evaluate and compare the effectiveness of the ChatGPT-4 system in providing personalized, evidence-based nutritional recommendations in English, Kazakh, and Russian in Central Asia.
Methods
This study was conducted from 15 May to 31 August, 2023. On the basis of 50 mock patient profiles, ChatGPT-4 generated dietary advice, and responses were evaluated for personalization, consistency, and practicality using a 5-point Likert scale. To identify significant differences between the 3 languages, the Kruskal–Wallis test was conducted. Additional pairwise comparisons for each language were carried out using the post hoc Dunn's test.
Results
ChatGPT-4 showed a moderate level of performance in each category for English and Russian languages, whereas in Kazakh language, outputs were unsuitable for evaluation. The scores for English, Russian, and Kazakh were as follows: for personalization, 3.32 ± 0.46, 3.18 ± 0.38, and 1.01 ± 0.06; for consistency, 3.48 ± 0.43, 3.38 ± 0.39, and 1.09 ± 0.18; and for practicality, 3.25 ± 0.41, 3.37 ± 0.38, and 1.07 ± 0.15, respectively. The Kruskal–Wallis test indicated statistically significant differences in ChatGPT-4's performance across the 3 languages (P < 0.001). Subsequent post hoc analysis using Dunn’s test showed that the performance in both English and Russian was significantly different from that in Kazakh.
Conclusions
Our findings show that, despite using identical prompts across 3 distinct languages, the ChatGPT-4's capability to produce sensible outputs is limited by the lack of training data in non-English languages. Thus, a customized large language model should be developed to perform better in underrepresented languages and to take into account specific local diets and practices.
Keywords: AI; LLMs; personalized diet; precision nutrition; Chatbots; Medical Natural Language Processing (NLP)
Bib
Gulnoza Adilmetova, Ruslan Nassyrov, Aizhan Meyerbekova, Aknur Karabay, Huseyin Atakan Varol, Mei-Yen Chan,
Evaluating ChatGPT’s Multilingual Performance in Clinical Nutrition Advice Using Synthetic Medical Text: Insights from Central Asia,
The Journal of Nutrition,
Volume 155, Issue 3,
2025,
Pages 729-735,
ISSN 0022-3166,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tjnut.2024.12.018.
(https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022316624012458)
Abstract: Background
Although large language models like ChatGPT-4 have demonstrated competency in English, their performance for minority groups speaking underrepresented languages, as well as their ability to adapt to specific sociocultural nuances and regional cuisines, such as those in Central Asia (for example, Kazakhstan), still requires further investigation.
Objectives
To evaluate and compare the effectiveness of the ChatGPT-4 system in providing personalized, evidence-based nutritional recommendations in English, Kazakh, and Russian in Central Asia.
Methods
This study was conducted from 15 May to 31 August, 2023. On the basis of 50 mock patient profiles, ChatGPT-4 generated dietary advice, and responses were evaluated for personalization, consistency, and practicality using a 5-point Likert scale. To identify significant differences between the 3 languages, the Kruskal–Wallis test was conducted. Additional pairwise comparisons for each language were carried out using the post hoc Dunn's test.
Results
ChatGPT-4 showed a moderate level of performance in each category for English and Russian languages, whereas in Kazakh language, outputs were unsuitable for evaluation. The scores for English, Russian, and Kazakh were as follows: for personalization, 3.32 ± 0.46, 3.18 ± 0.38, and 1.01 ± 0.06; for consistency, 3.48 ± 0.43, 3.38 ± 0.39, and 1.09 ± 0.18; and for practicality, 3.25 ± 0.41, 3.37 ± 0.38, and 1.07 ± 0.15, respectively. The Kruskal–Wallis test indicated statistically significant differences in ChatGPT-4's performance across the 3 languages (P < 0.001). Subsequent post hoc analysis using Dunn’s test showed that the performance in both English and Russian was significantly different from that in Kazakh.
Conclusions
Our findings show that, despite using identical prompts across 3 distinct languages, the ChatGPT-4's capability to produce sensible outputs is limited by the lack of training data in non-English languages. Thus, a customized large language model should be developed to perform better in underrepresented languages and to take into account specific local diets and practices.
Keywords: AI; LLMs; personalized diet; precision nutrition; Chatbots; Medical Natural Language Processing (NLP)
